Should you advertise in newspapers?
Of course the newspapers think you should – However, their current behaviors, and the overall conditions of the newspaper industry, indicate that you would be better off investing your money into other mediums.
Let’s analyze the newspaper industry for a moment…
The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Boston Globe, LA Times and Chicago Tribune have all recently announced that they are going to start selling advertising on the front pages of particular sections (Read More…).
Did I hear that correctly?! They are going to start selling advertising on the front pages of certain sections!? Wow… This tells me that newspapers must be hurting for advertising revenue. They are hurting so badly that they are willing to compromise portions of the paper that have traditionally been reserved solely for news content. It’s as if they are defacing a sacred piece of real estate. They seem to be breaking an unwritten rule of the industry and it’s kinda sad.
If that’s not bad enough, the newspaper industry is also looking at its worst circulation numbers in more than a decade (Read More…). This honestly does not surprise me seeing as though we are in the birth of a digital age. Online mediums are easily accessible and, more often than not, free. Web content also has interactive elements that newspapers cannot claim. The real nail in the coffin is how a reader can pull up multiple perspectives on one particular subject with complete ease. The web is obviously superior to newspapers when it comes to the actual delivery of the news.
Claims of media bias are at an all time high (Probably a result of the abundance of war coverage). If there is even the slightest possibility that your newspaper of choice is writing biased material, it’s a struggle to truly believe the words that you are reading from there on out. Our human nature is to not appreciate other people making up our minds for us. We want to hear the facts and then decide for ourselves. Again, the web triumphs newspapers in that a reader can easily surf through several news sources, with varying viewpoints, and then manufacture their own beliefs based on the information that was given.
The newspaper industry is hurting. They have allowed a competing medium to beat them at their own game. Newspapers tried to be the Internet so they could compete, but the history of business tells us that “Thou shalt not be what it tis not.†It is amazing that newspapers failed to learn this concept while they were documenting the history of other companies that have made the same mistake.
So after learning of the sh$t-storm the newspaper industry is currently experiencing, I have come to the conclusion that I would rather not spend my money on newspaper advertising. Don’t get me wrong, I still believe that the newspaper medium has the potential to be beneficial to a specific kind of advertiser, but I ultimately believe that there are better advertising vehicles out there than this newspaper medium that seems to be determined to kill itself.
Wishing you continued success…
…bizMAVERICK…
Brad Williamson
Join The “bizMAVERICKS™†MySpace Page As A Friend!
Even if the action ratio were the same for any given ad – I’d much prefer the online & direct mail advertising because of the detailed tracking. This allows one to dramatically improve the response rates over time by being able to track small incremental improvements through experimentation.
Good post. Yes, it’s true, papers are suffering and why are they surprised? It’s absolutely natural.
I have been reading news from the web for a long time and I notice my 50yr+ executive colleagues do the same (Google News in particular). We are in the digital/information age and brick and mortar newspapers won’t be able to survive.
That messed up link in my comment is to longtail.com
Ed
The newspapers decline is totally due to their arrogance and shortsightedness – and it still continues. They simply don’t understand the VALUE of free information. Have you ever gone to a news site from an existing paper bound news source and hit a link to reading more of the story and suddenly come face to face with an alert that informs you that it is only availbale to subscribers? Every time this happens it irritates me and I never return.
They don’t get it. They are mired in a past business model. This happened to the music industry, is currently happening to the movie industry and has always been happening to print since the web started – hence they are the most arrogant- they still see themselves as THE news source.
We here on blogs understand that to communicate with our audience there is nothing worse than being paranoid with regard to providing free advice and information. I’ve experienced first hand how my exposure has improved and my ‘expert’ positioning has earned more respect among peers and prospects.
I think newspapers will eventually get it but not before they bleed big time. The local dailies will probably be the last to get smart. It’s so sad to watch, yet it does open new opportunities for content entrepreneurs. I’m waiting for the first local daily newspaper in North America to just go cold turkey, shut down newsprint editions and go totally on-line. Can they afford to bite this bullet?
Do they have the stomach to go long tail?Are newspapers no more than distribution vehicles for ad flyers?
Ed